|
The Lycurgus Cup is a 4th-century Roman glass cage cup made of a dichroic glass, which shows a different colour depending on whether or not light is passing through it; red when lit from behind and green when lit from in front.〔British Museum Highlights; Freestone, 270-273; see also (this pdf with good images under both lights )〕 It is the only complete Roman glass object made from this type of glass,〔(British Museum - The Lycurgus Cup )〕 and the one exhibiting the most impressive change in colour;〔Freestone, 271〕 it has been described as "the most spectacular glass of the period, fittingly decorated, which we know to have existed".〔Harden, 248〕 The cup is also a very rare example of a complete Roman cage-cup, or ''diatretum'', where the glass has been painstakingly cut and ground back to leave only a decorative "cage" at the original surface-level. Many parts of the cage have been completely undercut. Most cage-cups have a cage with a geometric abstract design, but here there is a composition with figures,〔(Corning Museum of Glass ), Cage cups;Freestone, 270〕 showing the mythical King Lycurgus, who (depending on the version) tried to kill Ambrosia, a follower of the god Dionysus (Bacchus to the Romans). She was transformed into a vine that twined around the enraged king and restrained him, eventually killing him. Dionysus and two followers are shown taunting the king. The cup is the "only well-preserved figural example" of a cage cup.〔Williams, 342〕 ==The glass== The dichroic effect is achieved by making the glass with tiny proportions of nanoparticles of gold and silver "dispersed" (the technical term in chemistry) in colloidal form throughout the glass material. The process used remains unclear, and it is likely that it was not well-understood or controlled by the makers, and was probably discovered by accidental "contamination" with minutely ground gold and silver dust. The glass-makers may not even have known that gold was involved, as the quantities involved are so tiny; they may have come from a small proportion of gold in any silver added (most Roman silver contains small proportions of gold), or from traces of gold or gold leaf left by accident in the workshop from other work. The very few other surviving fragments of Roman dichroic glass vary considerably in their two colours.〔Freestone, 275; ("Gold particles for imaging and Radiotherapy" ), 65-66〕 Corning Glass Works has reproduced a blank of a material of similar chemical composition and internal structure, blank which displays under reflected and transmitted light the same "Lycurgus effect" of green to red colour change as the Lycurgus cup material does.〔Freestone, 273, fig 6 a & 6b〕 Cranberry glass or gold ruby glass is somewhat similar and far more common, manufactured with colloidal gold, but this only ever shows a red colour. To a conventionally composed Roman glass flux 330 parts per million of silver and 40 of gold were added: "These particles were precipitated as colloids and form a silver-gold alloy. When viewed in reflected light the minute metallic particles are just coarse enough to reflect enough of the light without eliminating the transmission. In transmitted light the fine particles scatter the blue end of the spectrum more effectively than the red end, resulting in red transmission, and this is the colour observed. Since it is impossible that the Roman artisans managed to add these incredibly low levels of silver and gold to the volume of the glass used to make the vessel deliberately, the levels were probably added at higher levels to a larger volume of glass-melt, and increasingly diluted by adding more glass."〔Henderson, 63; see also Freestone, 272-273; originally published in Barber〕 The particles are only about 70 nanometers across,〔Barber〕 and embedded in the glass, so they cannot be seen by optical microscopy, and a transmission electron microscope is needed instead.〔Barber, 34; see also Henderson, 63〕 At this size they approach the size of the wavelengths of visible light, and a surface plasmon resonance effect takes place.〔Ashby, 30〕 The interior of the cup is mostly smooth, but behind the main figures the glass has been hollowed out, well beyond even the main outer surface, so that they are of similar thickness to the main outer surface, giving an even colour when light passes through. This is a feature unique among surviving cups; Harden suggests they were an "afterthought".〔Harden, 248〕 An area around the torso of Lycurgus is a rather different colour from the rest of the glass; perhaps an accident of manufacture, but one exploited by the glass-cutter "so that he could make Lycurgus's rage glow even more strongly".〔Williams, 342; Freestone, 274〕 After the very lengthy cutting stage the fine polished appearance was achieved by a process called "flame polishing" that risked the complete loss of the object.〔Harden, 248; Williams, 342, though Freeman, 274 reports "groups of regular fine parallel striations", and suggests the polishing was all done mechanically.〕 A suggestion in 1995 that in fact this and other cage cups used a mixture of moulding and cutting has met with little acceptance.〔By the glass historian Rosalinde Lierke (see also Hedwig glass). (''Roman glass in the Corning Museum of Glass'' ), David Whitehouse, Corning Museum of Glass; Freestone, 273-274.〕 Like the British Museum's other spectacular work in Roman glass, the cameo glass Portland Vase, the cup represents to some extent the extension of skills developed by cutters of engraved gems, or the larger hardstone carving of vessels in semi-precious stones, which were luxury arts with enormous prestige in ancient Rome. No carved gemstone vessels directly comparable to either work are known, but the general taste behind these extreme exhibitions of glass-making skill is one formed by objects in natural stones like the Coupe des Ptolémées or the Rubens Vase.〔Fleming, 92; see also Freestone, 273-274; for the Rubens Vase, see (the Walters Art Museum page )〕 Indeed it was not until the first full studies of the cup in 1950 that it was established for certain that the material was glass and not a gemstone, which had previously been in question.〔Freestone, 271〕 It seems likely that as many of three separate workshops or factories will have been involved in the whole process, perhaps not in the same part of the Empire. The glass may have been initially made in a large block of standard clear glass, perhaps in Egypt or Palestine, which both exported great quantities of glass for forming, and sometimes colouring, elsewhere. The thick "blank" dichroic vessel was probably made by one specialist workshop and passed to another consisting of specialist cutters. This would certainly have been a rare and highly expensive object, and the secrets of its manufacture, possibly not well understood even by its makers, seem only to have been used for about a century.〔Freestone, 275〕 There are various small losses, of which face of the panther is the most significant, and the cup is cracked; the British Museum has never removed the metal rim for this reason. The base or foot of the cup is damaged, and the original form of the base uncertain.〔Harden, 245〕 The Metropolitan Museum of Art, in New York has a fragment measuring 2 3/16 x 3 in. (56 x 76 mm) of a satyr from a dichroic cage cup that turns from olive green to "reddish amber".〔(Metropolitan Museum of Art )〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Lycurgus Cup」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|